"THE office joker. The mother hen. The king. The rebel. The gossip. The peacekeeper. The dude. Anyone who has ever been part of a workplace culture can probably recognize at least one of those characters in the cubicle next door."
I found an article in the New York Times called "Family and Office Roles Mix" by Sarah Kershaw that was absolutely wonderful. From the first two sentences in the article I could tell that this article was going to capture my full attention and pull me in.
As a whole, the article compares the workplace to a family. In this work place family the boss is considered the "disapproving and distant father," a manager is a "thinly veiled rejecting mother," and colleagues are "siblings in rivalry." The article said that co-workers can also feel like there are stepparents and a spouse. It also said that many businesses are trying to "gauge their effects at a time when emotions are running high. A growing number of business psychologist and executive coaches are also looking at the influence of birth order and other family roles and niches on office behavior."
This article was a very interesting piece to read because of the comparison of the workplace to a family. I would have never thought about the two being so closely related. I also wonder how the writer came up with the idea and where she went to start researching her topic.
A couple of quotes I liked in the article are: "When times are difficult economically, a workplace character identified as the “mother hen” — with a comforting voice of reason and empathy — may help raise the group’s spirit, Honey Langcaster-James, a psychologist, concluded. The 'office joker,' by contrast, “may decide that wisecracking” is 'no longer appropriate in such dire times.'", "The 'dude,' another character in the study, 'T-Mobile Workplace Motivation Report,' which is available online, is described as 'laid back and relaxed,' and this relaxed attitude 'also means that he/she doesn’t transfer pressure onto colleagues — a trait most workmates would be grateful for,' the report says."
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/04/fashion/04roles.html?_r=1&em
Friday, December 5, 2008
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Just a little something about the election
Well, I have to say the election did turn out sort of the way I thought it would. As soon as I saw how popular Obama was to the American public I knew he was going to be the winner. I saw friends of mine who weren't even democratic fall in love with him. He is such a charismatic person who knows how to deliver amazing speeches. He can tell the American people anything they want to hear. He can also say things that have already been said and make them sound fresh and new.
It was time for a change in America. Everyone was tried of Bush and wanted someone who was going to be far from Bush. Even though I feel McCain is very different from Bush, he still proved to be more of the same. It became very obvious that it was time for a change and when that change came people fell hard for it. I think from the moment people realized just how different Obama was going to be as president he had won the election. And in ways, I think he too even knew he had this in the bag.
It was time for a change in America. Everyone was tried of Bush and wanted someone who was going to be far from Bush. Even though I feel McCain is very different from Bush, he still proved to be more of the same. It became very obvious that it was time for a change and when that change came people fell hard for it. I think from the moment people realized just how different Obama was going to be as president he had won the election. And in ways, I think he too even knew he had this in the bag.
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Higgs Particle
Another article that I found very interesting was an article in the National Geographic called "The God Particle." This article was talking about smashing pieces of matter together in order to create some energies and temperatures "not seen since the universe's earliest moments." The particle was called the Higgs boson (or particle), also known as the God particle Scientist believed that this could help to reveal the particles and forces that "wrote the rules for everything that followed." But at the same time, the scientist didn't really know what would actually happen if they could pull it off.
This article was very enjoyable to read. There were a few parts that kind of confused me, but the subject is a very complicated subject to discuss so I expected that to happen. The points the writer brought up were very good point. For example, he said most people are afraid that this project could create something like a black hole, something you might see on a sci-fi movie. The writer said that these wasn't something the scientist actually feared. I also really liked the scientific history that he gave. The writer also had a wonderful sense of humor to his article. An example is, "the Higgs particle would be the carrier of the field and would interact with other particles, sort of the way a Jedi knight in Star Wars is the carrier of the 'force.'"
Some quotes that I liked were: "...and its purpose is simple but ambitious: to crack the code of the physical world; to figure out what the universe is made of; in other words, to get to the very bottom of things.", "That's the essence of experimental particle physics: You smash stuff together and see what other stuff comes out.", "'Bigger is better if you're searching for smaller' could be the motto at the European Organization for Nuclear Research...", "This is because a century of particle physics has given us a fundamental truth: Reality doesn't reveal its secrets easily.", "Put it this way: The universe is a tough nut to crack.", "...the Higgs particle would be the carrier of the field and would interact with other particles, sort of the way a Jedi knight in Star Wars is the carrier of the 'force.'", "Building a contraption like the LHC to find the Higgs is a bit like embarking on a career as a stand-up comic with the hope that at some point in your career you'll happen to blurt out a joke that's not only side-splittingly funny but also a palindrome."
"Naturally the moniker took root among journalists, who know a good name for a particle when they hear one (it beats the heck out of the muon or the Z-boson)."
Web site: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2008/03/god-particle/achenbach-text/4
This article was very enjoyable to read. There were a few parts that kind of confused me, but the subject is a very complicated subject to discuss so I expected that to happen. The points the writer brought up were very good point. For example, he said most people are afraid that this project could create something like a black hole, something you might see on a sci-fi movie. The writer said that these wasn't something the scientist actually feared. I also really liked the scientific history that he gave. The writer also had a wonderful sense of humor to his article. An example is, "the Higgs particle would be the carrier of the field and would interact with other particles, sort of the way a Jedi knight in Star Wars is the carrier of the 'force.'"
Some quotes that I liked were: "...and its purpose is simple but ambitious: to crack the code of the physical world; to figure out what the universe is made of; in other words, to get to the very bottom of things.", "That's the essence of experimental particle physics: You smash stuff together and see what other stuff comes out.", "'Bigger is better if you're searching for smaller' could be the motto at the European Organization for Nuclear Research...", "This is because a century of particle physics has given us a fundamental truth: Reality doesn't reveal its secrets easily.", "Put it this way: The universe is a tough nut to crack.", "...the Higgs particle would be the carrier of the field and would interact with other particles, sort of the way a Jedi knight in Star Wars is the carrier of the 'force.'", "Building a contraption like the LHC to find the Higgs is a bit like embarking on a career as a stand-up comic with the hope that at some point in your career you'll happen to blurt out a joke that's not only side-splittingly funny but also a palindrome."
"Naturally the moniker took root among journalists, who know a good name for a particle when they hear one (it beats the heck out of the muon or the Z-boson)."
Web site: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2008/03/god-particle/achenbach-text/4
Dealing With Cancer Patients
The article, "Clumsy remarks come along with breast cancer" by By Coeli Carr talks about how people respond to the news of breast cancer can have a big affect on the patience's life. The writer starts off tell how not everyone is thoughtful when speaking to people with life-threatening illnesses. She talks about how many people don't mean to sound as hurtful as they do, they just don't know how to react.
I thought the article did a wonderful job of expressing how cancer patience might feel from the reactions of their love ones, friend, and co workers. The writer used many great examples and was very descriptive of the emotions that might be caused. One quote she used was, "When Diane DeMeerleer, a breast cancer survivor from Kent, Wash., shared the news of her diagnosis, she received an e-mail response from her boss: 'Sorry to hear it’s the big C.'" The reader can see some of the awkwardness the boss feels about the subject of cancer. He even refers to it as "the big C."
Some other lines I enjoyed was: "'Give the other person the specifics and then let them say yes or no, and always allow them to have that control, says Wynn.' Making a specific offer shows that someone has thought about it and is sincere.", "Even if you’re not extending an offer of physical help, words that carry a bright outlook matter. Laurie Puhn, a mediator and communications expert, points to studies that show optimists enjoy better health than pessimists. 'Your job is to motivate your breast cancer friend to be optimistic,' says Puhn, who wrote 'Instant Persuasion: How to Change Your Words to Change Your Life.'", "Puhn suggests, for example, telling your friend that you admire the way she does a particular thing in the midst of her illness, and that she’s strong."
Web site: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21352634/
I thought the article did a wonderful job of expressing how cancer patience might feel from the reactions of their love ones, friend, and co workers. The writer used many great examples and was very descriptive of the emotions that might be caused. One quote she used was, "When Diane DeMeerleer, a breast cancer survivor from Kent, Wash., shared the news of her diagnosis, she received an e-mail response from her boss: 'Sorry to hear it’s the big C.'" The reader can see some of the awkwardness the boss feels about the subject of cancer. He even refers to it as "the big C."
Some other lines I enjoyed was: "'Give the other person the specifics and then let them say yes or no, and always allow them to have that control, says Wynn.' Making a specific offer shows that someone has thought about it and is sincere.", "Even if you’re not extending an offer of physical help, words that carry a bright outlook matter. Laurie Puhn, a mediator and communications expert, points to studies that show optimists enjoy better health than pessimists. 'Your job is to motivate your breast cancer friend to be optimistic,' says Puhn, who wrote 'Instant Persuasion: How to Change Your Words to Change Your Life.'", "Puhn suggests, for example, telling your friend that you admire the way she does a particular thing in the midst of her illness, and that she’s strong."
Web site: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21352634/
Sunday, October 19, 2008
Article on Breast Cancer
When I was browsing the internet, I came across an article called "Is my breast cancer upsetting you?" by Diane Mapes. The article talked about how sometimes women who are diagnosed with breast cancer end up being the ones who have to do the comforting. People are so overwhelmed by them having breast cancer they do not know how to react; therefore, they may react very negatively. The article then goes on to tell some ways women with breast cancer can approach telling others their bad news.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26959103/
I think the article touches on a very important issue that most people do not even think about. I can't even imagine what the women who have breast cancer have to go through with just having it much less the emotional ride other people take them one.
I feel the article was well written. As a reader I could feel connected to the women who were mentioned in the article and understood the point the writer was trying to make. Through the article I got a glimpse at dread or stress the women who have breast cancer are having experience when it comes to telling their families and friends about it.
I know from a first hand experience women who have it have a very hard time telling people. This past summer my mother found out she had breast cancer. When she first found out that she had a lump in her breast that might be cancer she didn't tell anyone about it (not even my father who she never keeps anything from). She didn't let us know anything till she knew for a fact she had it. Even then she had a hard time telling people. I think the article captures this stress and anxiety very well.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26959103/
Monday, September 29, 2008
An Insight into Debate Week
Every tedious night that headed into the wee hours of the morning were worth it. We all seemed to be connected; we were all one. Everyone understood we had to have a connection to get it done and get it done right. There were no different sections. No one took one more work than any other. We all worked together and were a team.
Friday night for the Student Media Center was a very special evening. For the past week, we had been working up to this one moment. The stress in the room was so thick you could almost cut it with a knife. Everyone was on edge and yet, at the same time, we were all laughing about seeing different celebrity journalist acting ridiculous from being way too stressed out. Everyone had a story to tell from that eventful day.
We sat in our budget meeting preparing to jump full force into creating a paper which will mark a piece of history. This was going to be the last paper telling the story of Ole Miss' first presidential debate; we knew it had to be worth wild. Already we had put out several absolutely breath taking additions after hearing the news about McCain possibly not coming and the possibility of there being no debate on Wednesday then Thursday still being left in the dark. The paper we did on Friday had to out shine both of them. It had to be the cream of the crop and with the dedication put in from everyone in the SMC it was.
Joanne Lipman - Portfolio Magazine
Until I heard Joanne Lipman speak about Portfolio Magazine, I never realized how interesting a business magazine could be or how much real news it actually covered. It's amazing how it takes big issues and looks at the business aspect of them. She mentioned a couple of issues they covered were how Brittany could help the economy and the Mormon cult story.
I found it amazing how she got her start in the journalism world. She said that she read a really great feature story in the magazine that almost seemed to be like a John Grisham novel and it caught her interest; from there she ended up pursuing it. I think it is absolutely wonderful to find something you love then go after it. You could really tell she had a great passion for her work. I only hope that one day I can go into something I love doing just as she did.
Another thing that she mentioned that I agreed with as well was about why she wanted Portfolio Magazine to be a monthly addition. She said that having a monthly issue would let you be able to set an agenda with out having to constantly compete to keep up with all of the daily and weekly magazines. They get so wrapped up in competing to break the news first that a lot of times they miss important issues. They also don't ever have a chance to do investigative reporting.
Saturday, September 20, 2008
Responce to an article from MSNBC
An article put out by MSNBC called Drawing Even talks about a recent poll put out by NEWSWEEK showing that McCain has now "pulled even with Barack Obama." According to the article, McCain is now tied with Obama among registered voters nationwide, 46 percent to 46 percent.
The article then goes on to talk about how the "all-Sarah Palin-all-the-time media coverage" along with the McCain jump in the polls has the Democrat party on edge. I feel that they have a good reason to be on edge because right now the McCain campaign is on fire. They are receiving the much needed and, in my opinion, deserved coverage that was lacking earlier in the year.
What's more troubling for the Obama campaign is the "dramatic hardening of McCain's support suggested in the poll." His support has risen from 39 percent to 71 percent, which is very dramatic. The article then goes on to say that only 29 percent of people say that Sarah Palin makes them more likely to vote for McCain. Well, I would have to say that I agree with these 29 percent of people. Palin is something new and fresh which intrigues people. Plus, it was a daring move for McCain to pick Palin as his VP. I feel this has also help to put him in the spotlight more.
All in all, I feel that the Democrats need to step up their plate because McCain will not be backing down now that he is getting more attention. If they want to stay ahead in the polls they need to make sure that Obama is played up in a good way; therefore, he will be able to get the media coverage that is crucial at this point in time in the campaign.
The article then goes on to talk about how the "all-Sarah Palin-all-the-time media coverage" along with the McCain jump in the polls has the Democrat party on edge. I feel that they have a good reason to be on edge because right now the McCain campaign is on fire. They are receiving the much needed and, in my opinion, deserved coverage that was lacking earlier in the year.
What's more troubling for the Obama campaign is the "dramatic hardening of McCain's support suggested in the poll." His support has risen from 39 percent to 71 percent, which is very dramatic. The article then goes on to say that only 29 percent of people say that Sarah Palin makes them more likely to vote for McCain. Well, I would have to say that I agree with these 29 percent of people. Palin is something new and fresh which intrigues people. Plus, it was a daring move for McCain to pick Palin as his VP. I feel this has also help to put him in the spotlight more.
All in all, I feel that the Democrats need to step up their plate because McCain will not be backing down now that he is getting more attention. If they want to stay ahead in the polls they need to make sure that Obama is played up in a good way; therefore, he will be able to get the media coverage that is crucial at this point in time in the campaign.
Friday, September 12, 2008
Editor's Credo
The main job of a journalist, to me, is to inform the public of the truth, whatever it may be. Journalist connect the American public with the rest of the world. Therefore, an journalist must respect the needs of the public and so should an editor. In knowing that a journalist's quest is to find the truth, an editor must be able to be flexible, understanding, and respectful to the journalist and the public. Editors are the final say so which gives them power; with power come responsibility. Editors need to be understanding because they will not always see eye to eye with the direction a journalist may have taken a story, but they need to be able to understand the reason why the journalist took that direction. Over all the editor needs to remember that he or she holds the power.
Response to Bill Rose
Change is something we see through out the years; it’s apart of life. Every generation has gone through a change that most of the time has been defined by the younger generation. The media needs to remember this when they set out to pull in the people of America. You cannot attract people who you refuse to understand or relate to.
American newspapers are slow to change. Bill Rose claimed that American newspapers are slow to change because there is always a tug-a-war going on between the business side and the paper side of journalism. I don’t believe this is true. I feel that many newspapers are afraid of changing something that has been the same for many years. If you were to go and pull a newspaper from 20 years ago and compare it to one today you wouldn’t find very many differences. Even Rose said that U.S. newspapers tend to cling to what they’ve always done.
Rose stated that in order for change newsrooms have to take control. They have to be able to break down the walls. He said change was like a civil war in journalism. I understand where he is coming from, but I do not completely agree with him. I do not feel a newsroom as a whole can make the changes needed. Instead, I feel that it has to be individuals who do the changing. It has to be people who are willing to step up and not be afraid to take the fall if they mess up. They cannot be afraid of change, being the leader or thinking outside of the box.
Rose must remember that the older generation is already hooked on reading newspapers. It is the younger generation who needs to be pulled into the mix. Who better to do that than people from our own generation? To be able to pull us in, he must first be able to understand us; therefore, he should go straight to the source by bringing in people from our generation to help lead the newspaper into a new era.
American newspapers are slow to change. Bill Rose claimed that American newspapers are slow to change because there is always a tug-a-war going on between the business side and the paper side of journalism. I don’t believe this is true. I feel that many newspapers are afraid of changing something that has been the same for many years. If you were to go and pull a newspaper from 20 years ago and compare it to one today you wouldn’t find very many differences. Even Rose said that U.S. newspapers tend to cling to what they’ve always done.
Rose stated that in order for change newsrooms have to take control. They have to be able to break down the walls. He said change was like a civil war in journalism. I understand where he is coming from, but I do not completely agree with him. I do not feel a newsroom as a whole can make the changes needed. Instead, I feel that it has to be individuals who do the changing. It has to be people who are willing to step up and not be afraid to take the fall if they mess up. They cannot be afraid of change, being the leader or thinking outside of the box.
Rose must remember that the older generation is already hooked on reading newspapers. It is the younger generation who needs to be pulled into the mix. Who better to do that than people from our own generation? To be able to pull us in, he must first be able to understand us; therefore, he should go straight to the source by bringing in people from our generation to help lead the newspaper into a new era.
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Lab One
What does the reader want to know the most out of the article?
How can we make it more precise?
How can the lead tell the reader what the story is going to be about?
When looking into the Oxford school district, there is an apparent need for volunteers who can help students that struggle in school.
Even though 20 mentors were recruited for Oxford High School and 25 for Oxford Middle School there is still a growing need for more volunteers in all the schools. For example, Oxford High School still needs 25 and Oxford Middle School even needs 100. The greatest need for tutors is in the lower grades, school officials said. They hope that the tutoring relationship might lead into mentoring.
There are many children who face each new school year with little optimism because they struggle in the classroom. Volunteers can make a difference in the lives of these children.
Each school, whether it be the elementary, middle or high school, has a need for tutors and mentors. There is especially a need for volunteers at the high school because of the greater risk of students dropping out.
Anyone interested may apply at the district office.
The Christenberry Artwork
Christenberry’s KKK artwork caused much controversy on the Ole Miss campus this week. Many facility, teachers and students felt that because of Mississippi’s past and the disturbing nature of the artwork. If we took down every piece of art that someone had a problem with then there would hardly be any artwork left. Personally, I feel that it is a very unique opportunity to have his artwork on our campus. Everything that is featured in his artwork is apart of our history and I don’t think we should be terrified to see it. I also feel that it helps the younger generation understand a small portion of what the older generation had to go through.
Even though I personally feel the artwork should remain on campus, I still understand why the artwork is so disliked by many. Vice Chancellor of Multicultural Affairs Donald Cole even said in an interview with the DM, “I think that if we had it to do over again, we would have it a year earlier or a year later. I just hope that people will not come away with the wrong impression like I did at first.” I feel that the university is very scared about what the exhibit will do to their image so close to the debate. Because of the debate, everyone’s eye will be on us. Since we’re a town in the South, people might try to assume we’re still very racist even though a large majority of us are not.
Even though the artwork was very amazing to me, it still had a very chilling factor to it. My first reaction when I walked in the room was something similar to, “Oh my goodness, all of the pictures are staring at me.” Also, the fact that the exhibit was behind curtains and had security watching over it really made it that much more creepy. I felt like I had walked back into the past when entering the room.
Even though I personally feel the artwork should remain on campus, I still understand why the artwork is so disliked by many. Vice Chancellor of Multicultural Affairs Donald Cole even said in an interview with the DM, “I think that if we had it to do over again, we would have it a year earlier or a year later. I just hope that people will not come away with the wrong impression like I did at first.” I feel that the university is very scared about what the exhibit will do to their image so close to the debate. Because of the debate, everyone’s eye will be on us. Since we’re a town in the South, people might try to assume we’re still very racist even though a large majority of us are not.
Even though the artwork was very amazing to me, it still had a very chilling factor to it. My first reaction when I walked in the room was something similar to, “Oh my goodness, all of the pictures are staring at me.” Also, the fact that the exhibit was behind curtains and had security watching over it really made it that much more creepy. I felt like I had walked back into the past when entering the room.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)